AppalNET  ·  Search  ·  Calendar  ·  Maps  ·  Help  ·  Office of Academic Affairs
 

 

Meeting Minutes

November 1, 2005

Announcements:

We had a wonderful forum on Friday with lots of discussion and people participating. We have generated a buzz and we want to keep that going. Our calendar is filled with speakers through the end of January so we will use the forums as a place to begin the discussion of models in the future. This will also allow us to engage people from outside of the task force.

What models shall we discuss at the next forum on Nov. 11? Dave Haney stated that general education models offered should not be at all prescriptive. We need to let people look at all the models. Farleigh Dickinson was named as a model that is radically thematic.

Sammye Sigmann volunteered to present the model of James Madison University, one that stood out in earlier CAS studies. She also suggested Brooklyn College, Harvard, UNC Charlotte, Portland State, Susquehanna, and Mary Washington.

Dave Haney suggested that we could pick the radically extreme ones so that we could see the range.

Mike Mayfield stated that we will face a challenge in getting across that what we’re presenting is not what we are pushing.

It was announced that Bill Ward of the Core Curriculum Council will be coming on January 10.

The Alumni/Employer Subcommittee announced that Sharon Jenson will be generating a list of employers coming in spring for us to interview.

Presentation: Marv Williamson and Bob White, Office of International Programs

Our mission is to provide a discrete set of international programs for students and exchange programs for faculty. Demands have been shifting recently to provide international education on campus. We received an award from the American Council of Education in 2002 for promising practices. Our chancellors have always seemed to have thought it was a good idea, but there is no clear mandate to provide international experiences to App students. It is not mentioned in the mission statement, for example. To find the extent the university values international education, you must look at the mission statement, the budget, and rewards to faculty. The university must make a clear statement of its values.


General Education effect can be transformative with its approach to internationalization. We are part of a consortium of universities looking at this issue of transnational competence, global competence. It is not achieved by requiring one or two courses.

Madeline Green’s article “From Tinkering to Deep Change” summarizes different approaches to internationalizing general education: (1) Adjustments, such as adding a course, (2) Isolated Change, such as courses affecting a small segment of the student population, (3) Far-Reaching Change, involving pervasive, major changes such as our opportunity now at ASU, and (4) Transformational Change, that is pervasive and in the core of general education for all students.

The normal level of international education involves 3-5% of the student body. ASU is in that category. The University of Minnesota, on the other hand, is a leader in transformational change and is working to ensure that all of their students have a study abroad experience. They are especially looking to boost international studies among minorities and those in the lowest academic quintile. And they are finding success! A FIPSE grant in 2002-3 helped this effort.

There are other models. At MacQuarie University, Australia, students can earn a study abroad certificate in which points are earned for certain co-curricular events on campus as well as study abroad.

NCA&T does something similar with a Global Studies Certificate for a set of courses taken. This is another way to test student global thinking.

Assessment is only beginning to take place in this field. NC State U has the guru for this in international studies. There have been only two studies published on assessment of internationalization.

The best examples of internationalization are at small liberal arts colleges. Goshen College attempted to get 90% of its undergrads overseas. They achieved 60%. You can have campuses overseas and have faculty directing them. This is very expensive. Davidson College is partnered up with schools overseas. They have high tuition, and they are able to have faculty serving as campus directors at 14 places overseas.

What about at comprehensive universities? One goal would be to get every department on campus to encourage international opportunities and study abroad programs. We could integrate the curriculum with overseas opportunities so that students could see that when they register for classes. We need to eliminate the problems of transferring credit for overseas courses, so students don’t have to go department to department requesting course credit. Europe is ahead of us on this by allowing transfer credit to move freely among their universities. A decade ago we had almost none of the investment in international education that we do now on campus. We can move forward.

The Bolognia Treaty in Europe means that classes offered at any university will have the same credit without any transfer issues.

Joan Woodworth has 14 students at Keele University. We will allow students to study abroad without losing a semester. Our students could have access to Japanese courses in business practices and low levels of Japanese language study at the same time. We have partner institutions that would be happy to work with us. Faculty collaboration is important. We need to develop joint degree programs with international universities.

We might consider, as a way of advancing knowledge of the world, insisting on a focus on a region, courses of studies that a student could select over four years. Foreign language is central and foundational to the study of other cultures and places. If you get students overseas, they will get over the barriers that are imposed by lack of a language. We need to find inexpensive ways to deliver foreign language on campus, such as virtual language centers on the web.

We need to test entering students on global knowledge and assess at the end of four years if they have improved. ETS had an examination on global knowledge that was used in World Civ classes.

There is a person who is in charge of a furniture company that builds furniture all over the world. He had me give him the names of students who are in China. He wants to get people to manage operations in China. This is one example of an employer who wants international competence. We need to look at the jobs we want our students to have in 15 years.

We need a mission statement at ASU that incorporates a vision of international education.

We need a Dean of General Education. One who controls budgets and keeps departments at bay.

Q: Mike Mayfield: How do they do study abroad at Minnesota? How can we do that? Do we have enough faculty?

A: This will fly or die on faculty involvement, which departments are involved.

Q: Sue Keefe: Having led programs, I’d say we need an office that might be in charge of arrangements. This is a big burden to individual faculty members.

Bob White: If it becomes in the interest of faculty to get involved, they’ll do it.

Marv Williamson: Faculty need to be rewarded and recognized for leading study abroad. We are proposing a travel office in the student center. We want to get a person to work with faculty.

There is a new thrust in the direction of service learning. We can’t provide insurance unless students are registered for courses. One hour credit doesn’t increase costs so much as to eliminate students.

Joni Petschauer: Perhaps we could have comparative studies Gen Ed where students have to cross the philosophies.

MW: Students aren’t aware that possibilities exist. We’re a lot further down the road than we were a decade ago. 66% of high school seniors plan to study abroad, but only 3% make it. Fewer study for a year or semester, more for a week or a few days. Most students at ASU don’t come thinking they will study abroad.

Ann Viles: Is there any way students can get experiential credit for having gone abroad?

SK: Our university used to do that.

Alexandra Hellenbrand: Another population that I’d be interested in is students who go back after studying abroad. This experience belongs in a vertical model. Students might go on a short-term experience abroad, then on a semester abroad.

MW: Appalachian has been providing teachers that have never been overseas.

BW: Models aren’t available yet. We have to create a model. At ASU, 7,700 out of 90,000 alums have studied abroad. How to build on this?