The Ethological Approach to Aggression 1. Like the Freudians, the ethologists have emphasized the genetic bases of aggression. Ethologists have primarily studied nonhuman animals such as fish and birds. 2. For Lorenz, aggression serves two basic functions. The first function is that aggression keeps conspecifics separated and thereby insures that there is enough area and resources to survive. The second involves sexual selection. Frequently the number 1 aggressor becomes the number 1 copulator. 3. Lorenz has generalized his observations of animal behavior
to humans. He contends that aggression is adaptive in most animals. However,
Lorenz warns that aggression can become undesirable when a species--such
as the human--fails to develop the usual instinctual inhibitions against
it. For instance, Lorenz notes that lethal combat seldom occurs among animals
with the innate ability to kill (e.g., wolves). The reason for this is
that these animals have evolved signs of submission that inhibit the aggression
of conspecifics. On the other hand, humans are "a basically harmless omnivorous
creature, lacking in natural weapons with which to kill big prey." Since
humans have only a weak ability to kill without weapons, they did not evolve
strong inhibitory mechanisms to prevent aggression. This analysis implies
that we have created weapons that work from a distance that we cannot control.
What would the murder rate be if we had to kill with our hands and teeth?
What is more likely to cause later emotional problems for the combat soldier:
killing by dropping bombs from a plane or running a number of people through
with a bayonet?
|