Sen, Geeti. Image and Imagination: Five Contemporary
Artists in India. Middletown, NJ: Mapin Pub. Pvt. Ltd., 1996.
Geeti Sen in his book, Image and Imagination, enters into a
discussion about contemporary Indian art. In his research Sen has
interviewed and studied five artists of the contemporary era in India.
Meera Mukherjee, Jogen Chowdhury, Manjit Bawa, Arpita Singh, and Ganesh
Pyne are identified as Indian artists without a particular school or
movement, “guided by their own precepts, powers of association and
formal training” (Sen 11). The author focuses on these individual
artists as he pulls from their images and imaginations the essence of
contemporary painting in India. The book is a collage of art, interview,
research, critique and analysis.
The five artists used in the author’s exploration are all very
different. Meera Mukherjee is a female sculptor, using Bengal folk art
techniques to make her bronzes. She takes the religious sculpture of the
folk artists and transforms their iconographic imagery into her
contemporary sculpture about contemporary issues. Mukherjee lives an
austere existence, devoted to the creation of her art through time
consuming and painstaking traditional methods.
Jogen Chowdhury draws and paints his dreams with symbols from the
Indian tradition, archetypal images that have been reused and redefined
by him as a personal language in his work. This hybrid symbolism makes
Chowdhury able to bring new meanings into the world through old vehicles
of knowledge. Access to his world is through the traditional
Indian world of gods, goddesses, animals, plants, and artistic
technique.
These two artists and the other three (Manjit Bawa, Arpita Singh, and
Ganesh Pyne) each have a particular way in which Indian tradition has
given rise to and merged with the contemporary existence to produce
their new breed of art. Sen’s thesis about these artists and
contemporary art in India is thus made apparent,
“It is the coming together of the known and unknown, the familiar
and the forbidden--that dynamic spark, that moment of encounter, which
engenders creation” (Sen 156).
The author’s past interests in Indian art, traditional and
contemporary, as well as his cross disciplinary research, could only
have helped lead him to see the conclusions made.
As before mentioned, the book’s content is a montage of art,
interview research, critique, and analysis. The photographs taken of the
various artists’ works are black and white and color. In the critique
of some of the paintings though, the art that is available in black and
white photography is inadequate to help the reader understand the points
delivered. In particular, Manjit Bawa’s and Arpita Singh’s paintings
come across as lifeless corpses drained of color. Indeed, Bawa cannot be
understood except for his color choices of background, foreground, and
object; and Singh’s paintings become the naive endeavors of a girl
without our ability to understand the strength of her color palette.
Geeti Sen makes the mistake, in trying to immerse the reader in too many
of the five artists’ images, of placing quantity over quality.
In addition, while his research and use of interviews definitely
helps to support his thesis, Sen’s language in the artistic critiques
of these five artists is overly positive and stereotypical of art
interpretation. The grandeur, subtlety, complexity, and simplicity of
these artists’ works are not once questioned by the author; in fact
everything is Wonderful! While it’s not really expected that the
author challenge the works that support his points, the analysis in this
book reflects the same type of optimism that exists prior to
confrontation and disagreement. Some understanding of possible
criticisms to his own ideas or to the legitimacy of the five artists
might help place the discussion on firmer ground, in context of other
research.
The book is plainly laid out, one artist after the other. His thesis
arguments are carried out by each artist with a continuity kept in mind,
but with a different point proved in each chapter on each artist. The
words of the author do not privilege the highly academic or preach to
the masses. There is the opportunity to gather as much information as
one can wish, at any level that one may be at, student, teacher, or
appreciator.
Conclusions made by the author are in context of contemporary India.
With the political history of recent India: religious riots between
Hindus and Muslims, armed conflicts between India and former colonized
counterparts, assassinations of prime ministers, et al., there is a
tendency to view contemporary Indian art as a vehicle completely
representative of institutions, revolutions, current affairs, etc. Sen
believes that while art is definitely available as an example to these
conclusions, there is also art that moves beyond the moment. The five
artists in his book are not so lost in the moment of contemporary India
to forget the archetypal symbols and the traditional Indian artistic
techniques of the past. Folk artist techniques learned by Meera
Mukherjee or the flat background colors used by Jogen Chowdhury and
Manjit Bawa as in classical miniature painting are some examples of
remembrance.
Of course, the title of Sen’s book, Image and Imagination, relates
the importance of the individual’s imagination in the production of
the image. These five artist have five different imaginations that can
only produce five different images. Those images are not only visible
artwork, but their hidden philosophies, spirtualities, histories,
politics, etc. The author’s concern for the individual’s imagination
and image is paramount in the conclusions he makes.
For my own studies Geeti Sen’s book provided a bridge between
traditional and contemporary art that I had been lacking. Understanding
the influence of traditional imagery and symbolism in contemporary art
helped to deconstruct the overly apparent Western Neo-Colonialist
influences that I had been seeing in contemporary Indian art. While
there are not many choices in material when studying contemporary art in
India--almost nothing at all--his book was, if not exhaustive,
definitely eclectic and informative enough to warrant use. I could
recommend this book to a friend, knowing that it would be a good
beginning into a complex arena of creation and analysis.