|
Full Name of the Test |
Rhode
Island Test of Language Structure |
|
Authors |
Elizabeth
Engen; Trygg Engen |
|
Year of Publication |
1983 |
|
Publisher |
University
Park Press |
|
Current Cost (include a list of additional materials such as score forms, etc.) |
139.00 |
|
Purpose of the test |
Recognizes
two needs in language assessment:
This
test was developed to provide a broad picture of a child’s understanding of
language structure. |
|
Ages for whom the test is intended |
3
through 20 with hearing impairments; 3 through 6 without hearing impairments |
|
List Subtests |
None |
|
Describe the normative sample |
91
kindergarten children for the hearing group with a mean age of 5 years 6
months The
group represented socio-economic classes and traditions found in the area.
Language or learning impaired children and children from non-English speaking
families were eliminated from the sample. The hearing impaired subjects
consisted of 69 children ranging in age from 5 to 16 from the Rhode Island
School for the Deaf. They presented a range of hearing losses and etiologies.
The hearing group was testes in the speech therapists room in the school with
only the child and the experimental present. The hearing impaired subjects
were tested in their classrooms during periods when the remainder of the
class was out of the room. |
|
Are the norms appropriate for use in Boone? |
No. |
|
Describe how reliability was established |
Reliability
was evaluated with Kuder Richardson formula 20 (KR-20). The result was 0.72
for the 91 hearing pilot subjects and 0.88 for the 69 hearing impaired
subjects that seemed to provide an adequate basis for further development of
the test with larger and more diverse groups. |
|
Describe how validity was established |
Validity
was considered using content-oriented validity and construct validity. The
first concerns how well the RITLS samples language comprehension as defined
linguistically and in a picture verification task of salient sentences. The
structures used in the test are precisely definable. The criteria are
sentence type which are determined by linguistic analysis. |
|
Describe a situation for which it would be chosen over the other tests |
It
could be used as a screening battery for school readiness and early detection
of problems that might interfere with success in school. |
|
Describe a situation for which it should not be chosen over the other tests. |
If
a clinician wants to use an assessment tool that has a set criterion for
satisfactory performance or order of acquisition, then he/she should not
administer the RITLS. |