|
Full Name of the Test |
Test of Early Language Development (TELD 3) |
|
Authors |
Wayne P. Hresko, D. Kim Reid, Donald D. Hammill |
|
Year of Publication |
1991 |
|
Publisher |
PRO-ED, Inc. |
|
Current Cost (include a list of additional materials such as score forms, etc.) |
Complete Kit $249.00 |
|
Purpose of the test |
1. To identify those children who are significantly below their peers in early language development and thus may be candidates for early intervention. 2. To identify strengths and weaknesses of individual children. 3. To document children's progress as a consequence of early language intervention programs. 4. To serve as a measure in research studying language development in young children. 5. To accompany other assessment techniques |
|
Ages for whom the test is intended |
2 years to 7 years – 11 months |
|
List Subtests |
Receptive Language Expressive Language Spoken Language Quotient |
|
Describe the normative sample |
2, 217 children in 35 states Measured during two different times: 1,309 in 1990-1991, 908 in 1996-1997 51%male; 49%female; 81%While; 13%Black; 6%Other; 89%No disability; 3%Learning disability; 5%Speech-language disability; 1%Mentally retarded; 2%Other; 79%Urban; 21%Rural; 1%Native American, Eskimo; 17%African American; 10%Hispanic; 69%European American; 3%Asian |
|
Are the norms appropriate for use in Boone? |
Yes |
|
Describe how reliability was established |
1. Content Sampling: Coefficient Alpha: Chose 6 age intervals Alternate Forms: Both forms were given during one session. Correlation between the two forms is a reliability index 2. Time Sampling: Test-retest 2 groups: 33 children (ages 2-4) from TX 83 (ages 5-7); 50 from SD, 33 from TX 3. Interscorer Given by two graduate students in Special Education from TX. Given to children ages 5-7. 51% Female; 49% Male. |
|
Describe how validity was established |
1. Content-Description Detailed rationale for items and testing formats of each Subtest Relationship subtests to other Language tests Conventional item analysis Differential item functioning analysis Content equivalence of both forms 2. Criterion-Prediction Between the raw scores with those of selected criterion tests 3. Construct-Identification Age Groups Academic and school related ability Intelligence Subtest interrelationships Items |
|
Describe a situation for which it would be chosen over the other tests |
An appropriate situation in which to use this test would be when assessing a child who appears to be behind the other children in his age group and/or in his class in his language skills. This test would help to determine whether or not a child could benefit from an early intervention program. |
|
Describe a situation for which it should not be chosen over the other tests. |
You would not use the test when assessing the strengths and weaknesses of a group of children. |