Full Name of the Test

Test of Early Language Development (TELD 3)

Authors

Wayne P. Hresko, D. Kim Reid, Donald D. Hammill

Year of Publication

1991

Publisher

PRO-ED, Inc.

Current Cost (include a list of additional materials such as score forms, etc.)

Complete Kit $249.00

 

 

Purpose of the test

1.      To identify those children who are significantly below their peers in early language development and thus may be candidates for early intervention.

2.      To identify strengths and weaknesses of individual children.

3.      To document children's progress as a consequence of early language intervention programs.

4.      To serve as a measure in research studying language development in young children.

5.      To accompany other assessment techniques

Ages for whom the test is intended

2 years to 7 years – 11 months

List Subtests

Receptive Language

Expressive Language

Spoken Language Quotient

Describe the normative sample

2, 217 children in 35 states

Measured during two different times: 1,309 in 1990-1991,

908 in 1996-1997

51%male; 49%female; 81%While; 13%Black; 6%Other; 89%No disability; 3%Learning disability; 5%Speech-language disability; 1%Mentally retarded; 2%Other; 79%Urban; 21%Rural; 1%Native American, Eskimo; 17%African American; 10%Hispanic; 69%European American; 3%Asian

 

Are the norms appropriate for use in Boone?

Yes

Describe how reliability was established

1.      Content Sampling:

              Coefficient Alpha: Chose 6 age intervals

              Alternate Forms: Both forms were given during one

              session.  Correlation between the two forms is a reliability

              index

2.      Time Sampling:

              Test-retest

                       2 groups: 33 children (ages 2-4) from TX

                                       83 (ages 5-7); 50 from SD, 33 from TX

3.      Interscorer

              Given by two graduate students in Special Education from

              TX.  Given to children ages 5-7.  51% Female; 49% Male.

 

Describe how validity was established

1.      Content-Description

              Detailed rationale for items and testing formats of each

              Subtest

              Relationship subtests to other Language tests

              Conventional item analysis

              Differential item functioning analysis

              Content equivalence of both forms

2.      Criterion-Prediction

              Between the raw scores with those of selected criterion tests

3.      Construct-Identification

               Age

               Groups

               Academic and school related ability

               Intelligence

               Subtest interrelationships

               Items

Describe a situation for which it would be chosen over the other tests

An appropriate situation in which to use this test would be when assessing a child who appears to be behind the other children in his age group and/or in his class in his language skills.  This test would help to determine whether or not a child could benefit from an early intervention program. 

Describe a situation for which it should not be chosen over the other tests.

You would not use the test when assessing the strengths and weaknesses of a group of children.